Drink wine on a regular basis? It doesn’t matter if your weekly wine budget is ten dollars or fifty dollars, everyone wants to find wines that over perform for the price. In fact, the English use an acronym for this, they call it a great ‘QPR’ wine (quality price ratio). Oddly enough, wine ratings don’t consider cost, which is dumb because a study by Merril Partners in 2012 pointed out how the second most important factor in purchasing wine was price! The first, in case you are wondering is type of wine. So, how do we go about finding good cheap wine? After looking at price averages for quality on some of the most popular varieties in the world, we’ve created a list of where to look for different types of red wines. Over 75% of the world’s Malbec vineyards are in Mendoza, Argentina so this is where you’re going to find the best (and also the worst) Malbec in the world. Since 2010, the value of Argentina’s peso has dropped by nearly half of what it was, which means the cost of wine should have decreased for importers.

Hopefully, we’ll see these savings soon. If you love a smooth and lush style of Malbec, I recommend looking for wines with moderate oak aging with about 12+ months in oak. Cabernet Sauvignon is the most planted variety in the world. The total vineyard area is over 2 times the size of New York City! Despite Cab’s plentiful plantings, it’s still hard to find great QPRs. Fortunately, the United States makes some of the best Cabernet in the world and, at this moment, there are 4 undervalued regions outside of Napa where you can find value. The lion’s share of Syrah/Shiraz comes from three places: France, Australia and Spain. If you’re seeking Aussie Shiraz, and you spend $10, the wine will most likely be from massive commercial farms in the inland appellations of Riverina, Riverland or Murray Darling. Not that this is bad, Australia has one of the most advanced and efficient commercial wine operations in the world. However, parting with a twenty will get you into a range of much better quality.

Spanish Syrah has all lush fruit of an Aussie Shiraz as well as a distinct leathery flavor typical of Old World wine. Zinfandel is one of the most undervalued reds. It has the same burst of fruit as Syrah, but with a little more red fruit flavors and spiciness. There are a surprising number of very old vineyards of Zinfandel scattered throughout California. best rated wine tours napa valleySome vines are 80-100 years old. what is the best homemade wine recipeIf you spend a little more and get a Zinfandel from a hillside estate in Napa or Sonoma, you’ll be surprised at the amazing quality for the money.good red wine online india $10: 2010–2013 Pinot Noir from Victoria, Australia $10–15: 2012 Pinot Noir from Languedoc Roussillon, France & Patagonia, Argentina

$15-20: 2012 Pinot Noir from Santa Barbara, Sonoma, Central Coast, & San Luis Obispo, California $18-25: 2012 Pinot Noir from Oregon; Ahr & Baden Germany; Central Otago, New Zealand; $20-30: 2012 Pinot Noir from Burgundy in Marsannay, Santenay, Mercurey & Givry There are several reasons why Pinot Noir is so expensive. One reason is that the demand for high quality red Pinot Noir far exceeds the vineyards planted. Another reason is, of all the popular grape varieties (save for Zin), Pinot Noir is one of the most difficult vines to grow well. Surprisingly enough, gobs of great Pinot Noir can be found in California and Victoria, Australia.Always Try New Wines Now that you know where to look for all your favorite and familiar red wines. Here are a few articles that will suggest a few great ways to drink wines made from anything but the 18 Noble Grapes. Esoteric Grapes that are Worth Getting to Know Uniquely Italian Red Wines by Flavor 5 Up-and-Coming Regions for Wines Under $15

Explore Wine By Flavor on a Poster This wine poster identifies over 200 different types of wine based on flavor. It’s our most popular wine print. Merrill Partners 2012 study on factors determining how Americans choose wine. on March 20, 2017 at 2:00 PM, updated 2013 was a great year for fans of the Boston Red Sox, Baltimore Ravens and Chicago Blackhawks. I still vividly remember that year since I was lucky enough to see Shane Victorino hit a grand slam home run in person in Game Six of the American League playoffs to send the Sox to the World Series. But when it comes to wine, 2013 wasn't one of its better years for some wine regions. At least, that's what many experts say. And that's especially true for Burgundy, one of the world's great wine regions in France. Many wine experts claim 2013 was an average vintage for Burgundy. In contrast, 2005, 2009 and 2010 were real show-stopping years. Those are the ones most people chase after and stock up on.

And like wines from France's Bordeaux region, many of the best ones from Burgundy's best years often take decades to mature. I have a few 2005 red Burgundies in my basement and they're still not ready to drink. I know because I mistakenly opened one last year and I should have waited at least another five to 10 years. The 2005 tasted tight and reserved and didn't have any of the beautiful, floral flavors you would expect from a great Burgundy. But what about Burgundies from so-called "lesser" years like 2013? And are they any good now? That's what I was thinking recently when I spotted three, 2013 Burgundies for under $30 sitting on the shelf at a store. The three wines were: Spending $20 to $28 a bottle on a lesser bottle of wine might seem like a lot of money, especially since I just wrote last week about $7 red wines from Barefoot winery in California. But when it comes to Burgundy wines, anything less than $30 a bottle can seem like a steal. You can easily spend more than $50 or $100 on a single bottle.

And some Burgundy fanatics spend thousands of dollars on a single bottle of wine. That's why I was intrigued but also a little wary of the 2013 Burgundies I debated buying. Were these wines simply overpriced duds trying to ride on the coattails of other, higher priced wines from better vintages? If these three wines are any indication, my whole notion of which wines to buy and when to drink them has been turned on its head. Because in all three cases, all three wines tasted absolutely fantastic right now. For years, I thought you had to wait at least 10 or 20 years to drink most red Burgundy wines. That may be true for some blockbuster, full-throttled years like 2005 or 2010. All I know is the three 2013's I tried tasted terrific now. So while I will definitely continue to search for affordable gem from top vintages to save for many years, I'm all in favor of trying Burgundies from other years sooner rather than later. People have been making wine from grapes grown in the limestone-rich soil of Burgundy (called "Bourgogne" in French) in the eastern part of France since the second century.

First, the Romans made wine there. Nowadays, a relatively-small number of wineries (about 100) make some of the world's most coveted wines. One of the reasons why wines from Burgundy are so expensive has to do with the relatively small size of the region. Burgundy's roughly 69,000 acres. In contrast, Bordeaux's more than 250,000 acres, Languedoc-Roussillon's more than 500,000 acres and the Rhone and Loire regions are each more than 160,000 acres. Within Burgundy, there are several small subregions, most notably: Two grape varieties dominate Burgundy: Pinot Noir for red wines and Chardonnay for white wines. Let me add that Burgundy wines made with these two grape varieties are hands down some of the best examples of what can be done with these versatile grapes. Nothing beats an amazing, plump Pinot Noir or bone-dry Chardonnay from Burgundy! 2013 Louis Jadot Pinot Noir Bourgogne NOTES: This wine was the most fruit forward of the three wines reviewed here. By fruit forward, I mean the fruit flavors (cherry, strawberry) in the wine were front and center right away.

But this isn't a sweet wine. Like the other two Burgundies reviewed here, this one was on the drier side. The wine also had a bright, full aftertaste that lingered on my taste buds long after the final sip. Let me add that the wine still tasted terrific two days after I first opened the bottle. A real gem ready to drink now. 2013 Alain Corcia Domaine Mestre Beaurepaire Santenay 1er Cru Passe-Temps REGION: Cote de Beaune, Burgundy, France NOTES: The driest of the three wines reviewed here, this smooth, velvety wine tasted absolutely beautiful. The wine was a little tight at first. Some of the flavors didn't fully express themselves at first. But by the second sip 15 or 20 minutes later, all the gorgeous flavors (dried plums, apricots, dark chocolate) vividly came to life. That said, the flavors in this wine were more muted than the other two wines reviewed this week. Instead of expressing everything in a loud, firm voice, this wine whispered and quietly revealed its secrets.

Let me add that the wine still tasted terrific two days after first being opened. Beautiful and ready to drink now. 2013 Domaine Chevillon Bourgogne Passetoutgrain NOTES: I saved the best for last. This stunning, subtle blend of two grapes represents the best of both worlds - the plump, hearty flavors you would expect from a great Pinot Noir, along with the slight fruitiness that often comes with great Gamay wines. The blend of the two grapes probably explains why this wine tasted so great now. Often, Pinot Noirs from Burgundy take years to reach their potential. This wine doesn't need any more aging. It's at its peak right now. And like the other two wines reviewed this week, the wine's luscious, dry, fruit flavors were still there in all their glory two days after I first opened the wine. Truly enjoyed all three wines. And I loved how they all tasted terrific just four years after they were first harvested. In many ways, they reminded me of younger, red wines from France's Chateauneuf De Pape region, which often taste great at 4 to 6 years old.